Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
This text of Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) JAMES R. NIBLOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1346 (JEB) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Federal Bureau of Investigation filed a motion for summary judgment on April
18, 2011. In its June 9, 2011, Order, the Court advised Plaintiff, among other things, of his
obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly
warned Plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by July 15, 2011, the Court would treat the
motion as conceded. To date, Plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional
time to do so. He may well have not opposed the Motion because, during the pendency of the
case, Defendant uncovered 3,137 pages of responsive documents and released all disclosable,
nonexempt documents, in whole or in part, to Plaintiff.
The Court, accordingly, will grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as
conceded. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge DATE: July 29, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niblock-v-federal-bureau-of-investigation-dcd-2011.