Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency
63 A.D.3d 1664, 879 N.Y.S.2d 746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2009·No. Appeal No. 3·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered June 23, 2008. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture for leave to reargue or renew the denial of its motion to consolidate action Nos. 1 and 2.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in DiCienzo v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (63 AD3d 1663 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, 63 A.D.3d 1664, 879 N.Y.S.2d 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
63 A.D.3d 1664 (Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DiCienzo v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency
63 A.D.3d 1663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)