Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency

Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency

63 A.D.3d 1664, 879 N.Y.S.2d 746
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 2009
DocketAppeal No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 1664 (Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, 63 A.D.3d 1664, 879 N.Y.S.2d 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered June 23, 2008. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture for leave to reargue or renew the denial of its motion to consolidate action Nos. 1 and 2.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in DiCienzo v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (63 AD3d 1663 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiCienzo v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency
63 A.D.3d 1663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 1664, 879 N.Y.S.2d 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niagara-venture-v-niagara-falls-urban-renewal-agency-nyappdiv-2009.