Niagara Real Estate, Inc. v. Wollstein

198 A.D.2d 913, 604 N.Y.S.2d 464
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: We disagree with Supreme Court that plaintiff Niagara Computer Sales, Inc., was bound by the one-year Statute of Limitations set forth in the invoice. Its terms are not binding upon the purchaser because the invoice was not sent within a reasonable time within the meaning of UCC 2-207 (1) (see, In re Empire Pac. Indus., 71 Bankr 500). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boomer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Niagara Real Estate, Inc. v. Wollstein, 198 A.D.2d 913, 604 N.Y.S.2d 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 913 (Niagara Real Estate, Inc. v. Wollstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related