Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Tonawanda Assessor

233 A.D.2d 920, 649 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13413
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 1996·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted respondents’ motion to settle the record on appeal and did not improperly limit the record on respondents’ appeals. The contention of petitioner that the court erred in denying its cross motion to resettle a prior order by failing to include certain case law has not been preserved for our review. We note, in any event, that "an order denying a motion to resettle a substantive portion of a previous order is not appeal-able” (Gifaldi v Dumont Co., 172 AD2d 1025, 1026). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Tonawanda Assessor, 233 A.D.2d 920, 649 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 920 (Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Tonawanda Assessor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grandview Heights Ass'n v. Board of Assessors of Greece
176 Misc. 2d 901 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)