NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 1574 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2011·No. CA 10-02303·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

584 CA 10-02303 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS NATIONAL GRID, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR, TOWN OF NIAGARA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, TOWN OF NIAGARA AND COUNTY OF NIAGARA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ALBANY (MARK D. LANSING OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL B. RISMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered February 3, 2010 in proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 and RPTL article 7. The judgment denied the petitions and awarded respondents statutory costs.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

584 CA 10-02303 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS NATIONAL GRID, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR, TOWN OF NIAGARA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, TOWN OF NIAGARA AND COUNTY OF NIAGARA, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ALBANY (MARK D. LANSING OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL B. RISMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR (NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. TOWN OF NIAGARA ASSESSOR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.