Niagara Midland Co. v. Mercury Record Corp.
This text of 3 A.D.2d 694 (Niagara Midland Co. v. Mercury Record Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified so as to provide “ without prejudice to defendant’s application for an examination and limited inspection pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act if so advised” and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Under the circumstances present here the discretion of the Special Term should not be disturbed. The defendant may obtain the information desired by proceeding under section 296 of the Civil Practice Act in connection with an examination before trial if it so desires. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term denying a motion by defendant Mercury Record Corporation to compel plaintiff to produce and permit defendants to examine various records and books.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 694, 158 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niagara-midland-co-v-mercury-record-corp-nyappdiv-1957.