Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Hartford Insurance

187 A.D.2d 1019, 593 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14067

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: November 18, 1992
• Status: Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied the motion and cross motion for summary judgment as premature. Whether coverage B of the insurance policy at issue applies at all depends upon the resolution of questions of fact in the Federal action (see generally, New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527, 531; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 317, 325-326). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.