Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Euro-United Corp.
306 A.D.2d 952, 763 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6960
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2003·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
—Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the caption and the ordering paragraph of the memorandum and order entered March 21, 2003 (303 AD2d 920) are amended by deleting “KPMG INC.” in any capacity other than as interim receiver for Euro-United Corporation. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Euro-United Corp., 306 A.D.2d 952, 763 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
306 A.D.2d 952 (Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Euro-United Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PEAK DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. CONSTRUCTION EXCHANGE
100 A.D.3d 1394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re the Dissolution of El-Roh Realty Corp.
74 A.D.3d 1796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Charlebois v. Carisbrook Industries, Inc.
23 A.D.3d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)