Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Halpin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Halpin

267 A.D. 853, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Halpin. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 A.D. 236 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1944·Published

Opinion

Motion to substitute John White in place of John L. Halpin as one of the defendants-respondents granted. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. This court hereby certifies the following question to the Court of Appeals: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? [See ante, p. 236; post, p. 926, sub nom. Niagara Falls Power Co. V. White.] Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to substitute John White in place of John L. Halpin as one of the defendants-respondents granted. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. This court hereby certifies the following question to the Court of Appeals: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? [See ante, p. 236; post, p. 926, sub nom. Niagara Falls Power Co. V. White.] Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.

Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Halpin, 267 A.D. 853, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

267 A.D. 853 (Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Halpin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.