Niagara County Department of Social Services v. Reichard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Niagara County Department of Social Services v. Reichard

144 A.D.2d 966, 534 N.Y.S.2d 46, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 A.D.2d 966 (Niagara County Department of Social Services v. Reichard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Niagara County Department of Social Services v. Reichard, 144 A.D.2d 966, 534 N.Y.S.2d 46, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed with costs. Memorandum: A filiation order which does not provide for support is not appealable without permission when support is requested in the petition (Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 64 NY2d 15, affd on remittal 108 AD2d 1050 revd and remanded for new hearing 65 NY2d 994; Adams v Brant, 130 AD2d 957). Had the matter been properly before us, we would have affirmed. Although the court erred by admitting the HLA test results without a proper foundation the testimony of the mother and the respondent constituted clear and convincing evidence of paternity. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — paternity.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed with costs. Memorandum: A filiation order which does not provide for support is not appealable without permission when support is requested in the petition (Matter of Jane PP. v Paul QQ., 64 NY2d 15, affd on remittal 108 AD2d 1050 revd and remanded for new hearing 65 NY2d 994; Adams v Brant, 130 AD2d 957). Had the matter been properly before us, we would have affirmed. Although the court erred by admitting the HLA test results without a proper foundation the testimony of the mother and the respondent constituted clear and convincing evidence of paternity. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — paternity.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 966, 534 N.Y.S.2d 46, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niagara-county-department-of-social-services-v-reichard-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack