Niagara County Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra T. v. Ramo P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Niagara County Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra T. v. Ramo P.

234 A.D.2d 944, 652 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13679

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court erred in reducing respondent’s child support arrears by $9,667.50 rather than by $600. The arrears included four money judgments that had been entered against respondent totalling $18,932.86. Family Court Act § 460 (3) provides in part that, "when a judgment for such arrears has been entered pursuant to this section, such judgment shall not thereafter be subject to modification”. Family Court by its order modified the judgments by reducing them by $9,067.50. Thus, we modify the order by reinstating that amount in child support arrears.

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.—Support.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court erred in reducing respondent’s child support arrears by $9,667.50 rather than by $600. The arrears included four money judgments that had been entered against respondent totalling $18,932.86. Family Court Act § 460 (3) provides in part that, "when a judgment for such arrears has been entered pursuant to this section, such judgment shall not thereafter be subject to modification”. Family Court by its order modified the judgments by reducing them by $9,067.50. Thus, we modify the order by reinstating that amount in child support arrears.

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.—Support.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Niagara County Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra T. v. Ramo P., 234 A.D.2d 944, 652 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

234 A.D.2d 944 (Niagara County Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra T. v. Ramo P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related