NHL v. City of Pgh.
This text of NHL v. City of Pgh. (NHL v. City of Pgh.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE PLAYERS : No. 53 WAL 2024 ASSOCIATION, MAJOR LEAGUE : BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, : NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE : Petition for Allowance of Appeal PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, JEFFERY B. : from the Order of the FRANCOEUR, KYLE C. PALMIERI, AND : Commonwealth Court SCOTT WILSON, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court’s majority opinion departed from this Court’s precedent in Minich v. Sharon, 77 A.2d 347 (Pa. 1951), and incorrectly interpreted the Pennsylvania Uniformity Clause to require exact uniformity in the ultimate destination of the tax revenue among residents and nonresidents, rather than “rough equality” in the overall tax burden.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NHL v. City of Pgh., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nhl-v-city-of-pgh-pa-2024.