Nguyen v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 110637c (or.tax 10-14-2011)

• Court: Oregon Tax Court
• Decided: October 14, 2011
• Docket: TC-MD 110637C.
• Status: Published

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

A case management conference was scheduled at 3:30 p.m. on August 23, 2011, to consider Plaintiff's appeal. On June 27, 2011, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to the email address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiff did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.

On August 24, 2011, the court sent Plaintiff a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by September 7, 2011, for its failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining its failure to appear at the August 23, 2011, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.

Dated this ____ day of October 2011.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to:Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged. This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinsonon October 14, 2011. The Court filed and entered this documenton October 14, 2011.