Nguyen v. Barnhart
This text of 87 F. App'x 664 (Nguyen v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because the ALJ gave specific and legitimate reasons based on substantial evidence in the record, he did not err in rejecting the testimony of the treating physician. Andrews v. Shalala, 53 F.3d [665]*6651035, 1041 (9th Cir.1995). He also did not err in rejecting claimant’s testimony regarding her subjective symptoms, because he gave clear and convincing reasons for doing so. Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 834 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. App'x 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nguyen-v-barnhart-ca9-2004.