Nguyen v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Nguyen v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.

696 So. 2d 997, 1997 La. LEXIS 2021, 1997 WL 391530

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-C-1028

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 997 (Nguyen v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nguyen v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 696 So. 2d 997, 1997 La. LEXIS 2021, 1997 WL 391530 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Avondale Shipyards, Inc.; — Defendant©; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CA-0654; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. 7, No. 92-03262.

Writ granted. The decision of the court of appeal, reversing the trial court’s judgment maintaining defendant’s exception of prescription and remanding the matter for trial, is hereby vacated. The matter is remanded to the court of appeal to allow that court, should it deem it necessary, to order the record supplemented, and to thereafter consider defendant’s exception of prescription on the merits.

LEMMON, J., would grant and docket. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Avondale Shipyards, Inc.; — Defendant©; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CA-0654; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. 7, No. 92-03262.

Writ granted. The decision of the court of appeal, reversing the trial court’s judgment maintaining defendant’s exception of prescription and remanding the matter for trial, is hereby vacated. The matter is remanded to the court of appeal to allow that court, should it deem it necessary, to order the record supplemented, and to thereafter consider defendant’s exception of prescription on the merits.

LEMMON, J., would grant and docket. JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 997, 1997 La. LEXIS 2021, 1997 WL 391530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nguyen-v-avondale-shipyards-inc-la-1997.