Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
This text of 143 F.3d 1298 (Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
We vacate the findings of the administrative law judge for the misapplication of Social Security Rulings 82-61 and 82-62. See Henrie v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 13 F.3d 359, 360-61 (10th Cir.1993). On remand, we direct the administrative law judge to investigate fully the demands of the applicant’s past work and compare them to the applicant’s residual mental and physical capabilities.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 F.3d 1298, 1998 WL 328035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ngeunh-sivilay-plaintiff-appellant-v-kenneth-s-apfel-commissioner-of-ca9-1998.