Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

Ninth Circuit

Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

143 F.3d 1298, 1998 WL 328035

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 23, 1998·No. 97-16312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We vacate the findings of the administrative law judge for the misapplication of Social Security Rulings 82-61 and 82-62. See Henrie v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 13 F.3d 359, 360-61 (10th Cir.1993). On remand, we direct the administrative law judge to investigate fully the demands of the applicant’s past work and compare them to the applicant’s residual mental and physical capabilities.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We vacate the findings of the administrative law judge for the misapplication of Social Security Rulings 82-61 and 82-62. See Henrie v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 13 F.3d 359, 360-61 (10th Cir.1993). On remand, we direct the administrative law judge to investigate fully the demands of the applicant’s past work and compare them to the applicant’s residual mental and physical capabilities.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee, 143 F.3d 1298, 1998 WL 328035 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

143 F.3d 1298 (Ngeunh SIVILAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related