N.G. v. State
564 So. 2d 578, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5384, 1990 WL 102680
Opinion
We agree with the appellant that proof of the defendant’s presence as a passenger in a vehicle which he knew, or reasonably should have known to be stolen, is insufficient to support an adjudication of delinquency on charges of burglary or grand theft. G.C. v. State, 560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (on denial of rehearing April 24, 1990). The adjudication is therefore reduced to trespass of a conveyance and the case is remanded for correction accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
N.G. v. State, 564 So. 2d 578, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5384, 1990 WL 102680 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
564 So. 2d 578 (N.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G.C. v. State
560 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)