Ng Jung v. United States

Second Circuit

Ng Jung v. United States

233 F. 992, 147 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2545

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 24, 1916

DocketNo. 289

StatusPublished

This text of 233 F. 992 (Ng Jung v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ng Jung v. United States, 233 F. 992, 147 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2545 (2d Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question here is one of fact. There was testimony for and against the proposition that the defendant was born in the United States. The commissioner and Judge Lacombe, who reviewed the order of deportation, concurred in finding that the appellant was a laborer unlawfully in the United States.

We think the testimony warranted this conclusion, and that nothing in the record would justify a finding that both the commissioner and the judge were wrong. The United States is not estopped from deporting the appellant because of any act or omission of the special agent, Dannenberg.

The order of deportation is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question here is one of fact. There was testimony for and against the proposition that the defendant was born in the United States. The commissioner and Judge Lacombe, who reviewed the order of deportation, concurred in finding that the appellant was a laborer unlawfully in the United States.

We think the testimony warranted this conclusion, and that nothing in the record would justify a finding that both the commissioner and the judge were wrong. The United States is not estopped from deporting the appellant because of any act or omission of the special agent, Dannenberg.

The order of deportation is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 F. 992, 147 C.C.A. 666, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ng-jung-v-united-states-ca2-1916.