NG Crown 20 E. 46th St. LLC v. 18-20/22 E. 46th St. L.L.C.

2025 NY Slip Op 30413(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJanuary 31, 2025
DocketIndex No. 656817/2022
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30413(U) (NG Crown 20 E. 46th St. LLC v. 18-20/22 E. 46th St. L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NG Crown 20 E. 46th St. LLC v. 18-20/22 E. 46th St. L.L.C., 2025 NY Slip Op 30413(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

NG Crown 20 E. 46th St. LLC v 18-20/22 E. 46th St. L.L.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 30413(U) January 31, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 656817/2022 Judge: Andrew Borrok Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 656817/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 53 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X NG CROWN 20 E. 46TH STREET LLC,20 E 46 LENDER INDEX NO. 656817/2022 LLC, 06/21/2024, Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 11/13/2024

-v- MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 004 18-20/22 EAST 46TH STREET L.L.C., DECISION + ORDER ON Defendant. MOTION

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

HON. ANDREW BORROK:

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 were read on this motion to/for DISMISS .

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 were read on this motion to/for AMEND CAPTION/PLEADINGS .

20 E 45 Lender LLC’s motion to amend (CPLR 3025[b]) and substitute Madison 46th Realty

LLC and 20 E 46 BH LLC for the plaintiff NG Crown 20 E. 46th Street LLC (NG Crown) and to

amend the caption is GRANTED.

The determination of whether to permit substitution is addressed to the sound discretion of the

Court (Rosenfeld v Hotel Corp. of America, 20 NY2d 25 [1967]). Pursuant to CPLR § 1021, a

“motion for substitution may be made by the successors or representatives of a party or by any

party.” “Upon any transfer of interest, the action may be continued by or against the original

parties unless the court directs the person to whom the interest is transferred to be substituted or

joined in the action” (CPLR § 1018). The defendant in this case is simply not correct that there 656817/2022 NG CROWN 20 E. 46TH STREET LLC vs. 18-20/22 EAST 46TH STREET L.L.C. Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003 004

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 656817/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2025

is any discernable prejudice by virtue of the substitution. Paul Wassenbergh’s (NG Crown’s

representative) deposition has been schedule for March 18, 2025. This has been so-ordered by

the Court. This case has been pending for two years where the parties have engaged in

discovery. Even if this were not the case, and/or additional third-party discovery is needed, the

defendant is entitled to all third-party discovery “relevant to the prosecution or defense of [this]

action” (Kapon v Koch, 23 NY3d 32 [2014]; CPLR § 3101 [a][4]. The lender-intervenor has

also been responsive in discovery. Thus, the motion is granted.

The defendant is also not entitled to dismissal of the complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 61) which

seeks declaratory relief:

(a) Declaring that any order, judgment, settlement, assignment, assumption or other disposition of the Ground Lease and Premises in this Yellowstone Action as may be obtained by Landlord, Tenant, and/or any third-party shall not adversely affect, prejudice, preclude, estop or impair Lender’s rights, remedies, claims and interests, as leasehold mortgagee under the Ground Lease, pursuant to the Loan Documents, and in connection with the Foreclosure Action;

(b) Awarding Lender injunctive relief restraining and enjoining Landlord from terminating the Ground Lease without first (i) providing written notice to Lender according to the express terms and conditions of the Ground Lease, and (ii) offering Lender a new ground lease of the Premises with Landlord for the remainder of what otherwise would have been the term of the Ground Lease, at the rent and upon all of the same terms and conditions of the Ground Lease;

(c) Declaring that Lender (in its own name or through a receiver appointed by the Court in the Foreclosure Action) may commence measures to cure the Sprinkler Project default and any other defaults arising under the Ground Lease during the pendency of this Yellowstone Action, and affording Lender or Court-appointed receiver a reasonable opportunity to undertake efforts to cure;

(d) Granting Lender the costs and disbursements of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses; and

(e) Granting Lender such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

656817/2022 NG CROWN 20 E. 46TH STREET LLC vs. 18-20/22 EAST 46TH STREET L.L.C. Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 003 004

2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 656817/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2025

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 61 at 13-14).

A declaratory judgment requires that “the controversy involve present, rather than hypothetical,

contingent or remote, prejudice to plaintiffs” (American Ins. Ass'n v Chu, 64 NY2d 379, 283

[1985]). Declaratory relief is not an extraordinary remedy and is available in a wider range of

circumstances than it is prohibited (Morgenthau v Erlbaum, 59 NY2d 143, 148 [1983]). Simply

put, upon the record before the Court, the defendant’s position is that it can terminate the lease

and no further cure rights. This appears to be at odds with express provisions of the lease as to

the lender’s rights and presents a non-hypothetical controversy. As such, the motion is denied.

The Court has considered the remaining arguments and finds them unavailing.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Mtn. Seq. No. 003) is DENIED;

and it is further

ORDERED that the motion to substitute NG Crown 20 E. 46TH Street LLC and amend the

caption (Mtn. Seq. No. 004) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the action is severed and discontinued against NG Crown 20E. 46th Street LLC;

ORDERED that the caption be amended to read as follows:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

656817/2022 NG CROWN 20 E. 46TH STREET LLC vs. 18-20/22 EAST 46TH STREET L.L.C. Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 003 004

3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 656817/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2025

MADISON 46TH REALTY LLC, 20 E 46 BH LLC, 20 E 46 LENDER LLC,

Plaintiff,

-v- 18-20/22 EAST 46TH STREET L.L.C.,

Defendant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

to reflect the substitution and that all future papers filed with the court bear the amended caption;

ORDERED that counsel for the moving party shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry

upon the Clerk of the Court (60 Centre Street, Room 141B) and the Clerk of the General Clerk’s

Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119), who are directed to mark the court’s records to reflect the

change in the caption herein; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk of the General Clerk’s

Office shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse

and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the “E-Filing” page

on the court’s website).

1/31/2025 DATE ANDREW BORROK, J.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenfeld v. Hotel Corp. of America
228 N.E.2d 374 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Kapon v. Koch
11 N.E.3d 709 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Morgenthau v. Erlbaum
451 N.E.2d 150 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
American Insurance Ass'n v. Chu
476 N.E.2d 637 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 30413(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ng-crown-20-e-46th-st-llc-v-18-2022-e-46th-st-llc-nysupctnewyork-2025.