Ng Bow v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Ng Bow v. United States

190 F. 1020, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3835

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 27, 1911·No. No. 2,170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the evidence in this case it is clear that the appellant is not a late arrival in this country, but has been in the country many years, and we find nothing in the record to dispute the uncontradicted evidence that he was born in this country at the time and place claimed. See Gee Cus Beng v. United States, 184 Fed. 383, 106 C. C. A. 493. The decree of the District Court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to discharge the appellant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the evidence in this case it is clear that the appellant is not a late arrival in this country, but has been in the country many years, and we find nothing in the record to dispute the uncontradicted evidence that he was born in this country at the time and place claimed. See Gee Cus Beng v. United States, 184 Fed. 383, 106 C. C. A. 493. The decree of the District Court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to discharge the appellant

Ng Bow v. United States, 190 F. 1020, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 3835 (5th Cir. 1911).

Pincite

190 F. 1020 (Ng Bow v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related