Neyman v. Soutter
209 A.2d 430, 417 Pa. 634, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 462
This text of 209 A.2d 430 (Neyman v. Soutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neyman v. Soutter, 209 A.2d 430, 417 Pa. 634, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 462 (Pa. 1965).
Opinion
Neyman, Appellant,
v.
Soutter.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before BELL, C.J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.
*635 Robert Palkovitz, with him David S. Palkovitz, Jack Palkovitz, and Palkovitz and Palkovitz, for appellant.
Ines W. Cordisco, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 3, 1965:
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice MUSMANNO dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 A.2d 430, 417 Pa. 634, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neyman-v-soutter-pa-1965.