Ney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
778 So. 2d 509, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 2001 WL 194904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2001·No. No. 4D00-2274·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
On appellee’s motion for rehearing, we vacate our December 7, 2000, order remanding this case to the Unemployment Appeals Commission (“UAC”) for an evi-dentiary hearing to determine whether appellant timely received a copy of the UAC’s order. We, instead, dismiss this appeal without prejudice so that appellant may petition the UAC to consider vacating its original order and enter a new, appeal-able final order. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 778 So. 2d 509, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 2001 WL 194904 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
778 So. 2d 509 (Ney v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gundlah v. Moore
831 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)