Nexon v. Ladge
5 Mass. App. Ct. 796
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of a Probate Court judge denying the contestant’s motion to frame jury issues. The motion was heard on counsel’s statements of expected evidence. We have examined those statements (Abbott v. Noel, 337 Mass. 133, 138 [1958]; Guazzaloca v. Brooks, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 823 [1973]) and, after giving due weight to the decision of the probate judge, conclude that there was no error.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nexon v. Ladge, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 796 (Mass. Ct. App. 1977).
5 Mass. App. Ct. 796 (Nexon v. Ladge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abbott v. Noel
148 N.E.2d 377 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1958)
Guazzaloca v. Brooks
296 N.E.2d 508 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)