Nexon v. Ladge
This text of 5 Mass. App. Ct. 796 (Nexon v. Ladge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of a Probate Court judge denying the contestant’s motion to frame jury issues. The motion was heard on counsel’s statements of expected evidence. We have examined those statements (Abbott v. Noel, 337 Mass. 133, 138 [1958]; Guazzaloca v. Brooks, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 823 [1973]) and, after giving due weight to the decision of the probate judge, conclude that there was no error.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Mass. App. Ct. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nexon-v-ladge-massappct-1977.