Newton v. Wright

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Newton v. Wright

895 So. 2d 857, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616, 2004 WL 1753397

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedAugust 6, 2004

Docket2010342

StatusPublished

This text of 895 So. 2d 857 (Newton v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newton v. Wright, 895 So. 2d 857, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616, 2004 WL 1753397 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded, by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Newton, 895 So.2d 851 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of George Wright, Georgette Wright, and Guy Wright on the claim asserted by Robert H. Newton, Sr., under § 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala.Code 1975, is hereby reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

A portion of the prior judgment of this court has been reversed, and the cause remanded, by the Supreme Court of Alabama. See Ex parte Newton, 895 So.2d 851 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of George Wright, Georgette Wright, and Guy Wright on the claim asserted by Robert H. Newton, Sr., under § 25-5-11(c)(2), Ala.Code 1975, is hereby reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 So. 2d 857, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616, 2004 WL 1753397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-wright-alacivapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack