Newton v. Weaver & Burdick
This text of 18 F. Cas. 135 (Newton v. Weaver & Burdick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
thought that the Court ought not now to permit an alteration of the record of the last term for the purpose of making the judgment erroneous, merely because the counsel of the party was so negligent as erroneously to state a fact upon the record, the truth of which he had the means, by ordinary attention, of ascertaining. The judgment was correct according to the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. Cas. 135, 2 D.C. 685, 2 Cranch 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-weaver-burdick-circtddc-1826.