Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works

49 A. 339, 199 Pa. 646, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 672

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 4, 1901

DocketAppeal, No. 18

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 49 A. 339 (Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newton v. Vulcan Iron Works, 49 A. 339, 199 Pa. 646, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 672 (Pa. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The testimony introduced by the litigants required the sub[647]*647mission of the case to the jury. It follows that if there was no error in the charge or in the answers to the defendants’ third, sixth and seventh points, the verdict rendered and the judgment entered thereon should be sustained. An examination of the charge, and of the answers to the points referred to, have not convinced us of error in either. We therefore dismiss the specifications and affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The testimony introduced by the litigants required the sub[647]*647mission of the case to the jury. It follows that if there was no error in the charge or in the answers to the defendants’ third, sixth and seventh points, the verdict rendered and the judgment entered thereon should be sustained. An examination of the charge, and of the answers to the points referred to, have not convinced us of error in either. We therefore dismiss the specifications and affirm the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A. 339, 199 Pa. 646, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-vulcan-iron-works-pa-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack