Newton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Newton v. State

1930 OK CR 127, 286 P. 1118, 47 Okla. Crim. 131, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 284

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 29, 1930·No. No. A-6890.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*132 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquors, to wit, 'beer, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for a period of' 60 days.

The. appéal in this case was filed in this court on the 31st day of January, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument..

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors-depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*132 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquors, to wit, 'beer, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for a period of' 60 days.

The. appéal in this case was filed in this court on the 31st day of January, 1928. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument..

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors-depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Newton v. State, 1930 OK CR 127, 286 P. 1118, 47 Okla. Crim. 131, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 284 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 127 (Newton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related