Newton v. State

100 S.E. 784, 24 Ga. App. 372, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 675
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 6, 1919
Docket10522
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 784 (Newton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newton v. State, 100 S.E. 784, 24 Ga. App. 372, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the facts of this ease, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, it was not error to fail to charge the law as to reasonable fears. See Alexander v. State, 118 Ga. 26 (44 S. E. 851). Neither the evidence nor the defendant’s statement at the trial raised a theory which would require such a charge. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. State
44 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 784, 24 Ga. App. 372, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-state-gactapp-1919.