Newton v. Rice

118 Mass. 417, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 388
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 25, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 Mass. 417 (Newton v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newton v. Rice, 118 Mass. 417, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 388 (Mass. 1875).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

In an action upon a bond, upon proof of a breach,

the judgment must indeed be for the penalty of the bond; but the amount due and payable in equity and good conscience must be determined by the court, or by a jury or assessor under its direction, before execution can issue, and the execution must be limited to the amount so found due. Gen. Sts. c. 133, §§ 9, 10. [418]*418Austin v. Moore, 7 Met. 116, 125. Merrill v. McIntire, 13 Gray, 157. Fish v. Gray, 100 Mass. 191.

When the whole action is referred to arbitration by agreement of parties and rule of court, the reference includes everything which is required to be judicially determined in the case to entitle the prevailing party to execution, and includes both questions, whether there has been a breach of the bond, and what amount of damages the plaintiff is entitled to.

The award in this case was therefore within the authority ccs? - ferred upon the referees, and the judgment and award of exec* tian in conformity therewith must be Affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massasoit-Pocasset National Bank v. Borden
117 N.E. 911 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 Mass. 417, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-rice-mass-1875.