Newton v. . Mills
This text of 120 S.E. 925 (Newton v. . Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant relies entirely upon its motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the accepted position on a motion of this kind, we think the trial court was justified in submitting the case to the jury, and that the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.
No .benefit would be derived from detailing the testimony of the several witnesses, as the only question before us is whether it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, and we think it is.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 S.E. 925, 186 N.C. 782, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-mills-nc-1923.