Newton v. Gross
This text of 213 A.D.2d 1074 (Newton v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to defendants James J. Jakubiak, D.L. Peterson Trust and BASF Corporation. The conflicting opinions of the experts present issues of credibility to be determined by the trier of [1075]*1075fact. It is well settled that on a motion for summary judgment "the burden on the court * * * is not to resolve issues of fact or determine matters of credibility but merely to determine whether such issues exist” (Daliendo v Johnson, 147 AD2d 312, 317). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 1074, 625 N.Y.S.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-gross-nyappdiv-1995.