Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided July 7, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-05560·Unknown

Opinion

1 CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TACOMA DIVISION

) CIVIL NO. 3:20-cv-05560-RSM 10 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER 1] vs, ) ) 12 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, _ ) ) 13 Defendant ) 14 ) 15 . . This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion for attorney’s fees 6 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 17 . oe . Ly: The motion is timely as Plaintiff had a 60-day appeal period, plus the 30-day period in 18 . . §2412(d)(1)(B), from the entry of final judgement on April 8, 2021 to file a timely EAJA 19 application. Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852 (9"" Cir. 2002); Melkonyan y. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 20 . . 89, 94-96 (1991); FED. R. App. P. 4(a). Furthermore, upon review of the stipulation and the 21 pps “ye we record, the Court determines that Plaintiff is the prevailing party, the government’s position was 22 . oe, . not substantially justified, and that the itemization of attorney time spent is reasonable. In short, 23 the requirements of § 2412(d)(1)(B) are met. 24 25 David Oliver & Associates 2608 South 47" Street, Suite C ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 1 Tacoma, WA 98409 (253) 472-4357 david@sslawyer.org

Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court 2 hereby GRANTS the motion and awards Plaintiff $3,306.24 in attorney’s fees, subject to any 3 offset allowed under the Treasury Offset Program. See. Astrue v. Ratiff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 — 590 4 (2010). Payment of EAJA fees shall be sent to Plaintiff's attorney: David Oliver at David Oliver 5 & Associates, 2608 South 47" Street, Suite C, Tacoma, WA 98409. Pursuant to Ratiff, award 6 shall be payable to Plaintiff's attorney, David Oliver at David Oliver & Associates, if the 7 Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the Federal 8 Treasury Offset program. 9 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's stipulated motion for attorney fees is GRANTED; 10 DATED this 7th day of July, 2021. 11 12 Ricardo S. Martinez 13 Chief United States District Judge Presented by: 14 15 . S/David P. OLIVER 16 David P. Oliver, Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 David Oliver & Associates 2608 South 47" Street, Suite C ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 2 Tacoma, WA 98409 (253) 472-4357 david@sslawyer.org

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security (Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)