Newton v. Burtz

44 Ga. 599
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 44 Ga. 599 (Newton v. Burtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newton v. Burtz, 44 Ga. 599 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

(Bv two judges.) “It must affirmatively appear, either by the certificate of the presiding Judge or the transcript of the record sent up by the Clerk, that the bill of exceptions was signed and certified within thirty days after the close of the terna in avhich the cause was heard,” or the writ of error will be dismissed. (R.) 20th February, 1872.

The bill of exceptions recited that the cause was tried in May, 1871, and that the Judge committed certain errors. The Judge signed it on the 21st of July, 1871, saying he had retained it for ten days. It nowhere appeared when the Court adjourned. Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the writ of error was dismissed, because it did not appear that the bill of exceptions was signed and certified within thirty days from the close of said Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coker v. Life & Casualty Insurance
179 S.E. 626 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Parrish v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
135 S.E. 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Wallace v. State
84 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Bonds v. Berdett
38 S.E. 304 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Evans v. State
38 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Ga. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-v-burtz-ga-1872.