Newton, Ex Parte Roderick Dashad

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 17, 2010
DocketAP-76,456
StatusPublished

This text of Newton, Ex Parte Roderick Dashad (Newton, Ex Parte Roderick Dashad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newton, Ex Parte Roderick Dashad, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-76,456




EX PARTE RODERICK DASHAD NEWTON





ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE

NO. W99-36618-I(B)IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT 2

DALLAS COUNTY




           Per Curiam.


O P I N I O N


           This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071. Applicant was convicted of capital murder in February 2000. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Newton v. State, No. AP-73,778 (Tex. Crim. App. June 12, 2002) (not designated for publication).

           Applicant presents two allegations in his application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence. In his second allegation, applicant claims that the State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The State conceded that material exculpatory evidence was withheld from applicant. The habeas court adopted the State’s unopposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that this Court grant relief.

           This Court has reviewed the record with respect to applicant’s allegation that the State withheld exculpatory evidence. Based on the habeas court’s findings and conclusions and our own review, we hold that the record supports the habeas court’s findings. Therefore, relief is granted.

           We vacate applicant’s conviction and sentence and remand the case to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Delivered: November 17, 2010

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Newton, Ex Parte Roderick Dashad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newton-ex-parte-roderick-dashad-texcrimapp-2010.