Newtech Video & Computer, Ltd. v. 350 Seventh Avenue Associates

207 A.D.2d 730, 616 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 22, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.) entered on or about April 12, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from terminating plaintiff’s tenancy, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s motion for a Yellowstone injunction was properly [731] denied on the ground that it was not made within the period to cure the alleged defaults (Health N Sports v Providence Capitol Realty Group, 75 AD2d 884). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newtech Video & Computer, Ltd. v. 350 Seventh Avenue Associates, 207 A.D.2d 730, 616 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 730 (Newtech Video & Computer, Ltd. v. 350 Seventh Avenue Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benenson v. SKEK Associates
293 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)