Newsome v. Towers of Quayside

937 So. 2d 215, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14717, 2006 WL 2520875
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2001·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment because there are material facts at issue. Our reversal, however, is without prejudice to the appellees to renew their motion for summary judgment of these issues on a more fully developed record. Smith v. Mariner’s Bay Condo. Ass’n, 789 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newsome v. Towers of Quayside, 937 So. 2d 215, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14717, 2006 WL 2520875 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

937 So. 2d 215 (Newsome v. Towers of Quayside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. MARINER'S BAY CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.
789 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)