Newsome v. Thompson Child & Family Focus
Opinion
Joy Newsome appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice her employment discrimination action for noncompliance with a court order. A plaintiffs failure to comply with the federal procedural rules or an order of the court may warrant involuntary dismissal. Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.1989). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Newsome v. Thompson Child & Family Focus, No. 3:11-cv-00064-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
470 F. App'x 173 (Newsome v. Thompson Child & Family Focus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.