Newsome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Newsome v. State

529 So. 2d 1274, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2003, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3760, 1988 WL 88519

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2239

StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 1274 (Newsome v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newsome v. State, 529 So. 2d 1274, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2003, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3760, 1988 WL 88519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

The appellant raises several points on appeal, but we only find merit in his contention that the court costs imposed upon him should be stricken.

The appellant was not given prior notice and a hearing before court costs were imposed in violation of Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the costs without prejudice to the state to seek their reimposition after affording the appellant notice and a hearing. We note that the trial court must cite the proper statutory authority for any costs it may impose. Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

The appellant’s judgments and sentences are affirmed, but the court costs are stricken.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI