Newsome v. Newsome
117 S.E. 90, 155 Ga. 412, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 82
Opinion
The defendant having been called upon to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt of court and punished for his failure to pay alimony and attorney’s fees, and having filed a sworn answer which is undenied, and having introduced evidence which was uncontroverted, showing his inability to comply with the order to pay alimony and attorney’s fees, the court below erred in adjudging him in contempt. ' Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newsome v. Newsome, 117 S.E. 90, 155 Ga. 412, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 82 (Ga. 1923).
117 S.E. 90 (Newsome v. Newsome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brady v. Brady
187 S.E.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Boyett v. Boyett
15 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Banda v. Banda
14 S.E.2d 479 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Snider v. Snider
9 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Poole v. Wright
3 S.E.2d 731 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Banks v. Banks
3 S.E.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Scruggs v. Scruggs
193 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Heflinger v. Heflinger
159 S.E. 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Woodard v. Woodard
158 S.E. 569 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)