Newsome v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Newsome v. Commonwealth

299 S.W. 963, 221 Ky. 758, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 826

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedNovember 15, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 299 S.W. 963 (Newsome v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newsome v. Commonwealth, 299 S.W. 963, 221 Ky. 758, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 826 (Ky. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Reversing.

Alvin Newsome was convicted of the offense of manufacturing spirituous liquor. The officers acting under ■ a search warrant discovered a still which bore evidence ■ of having been used something like a week or more previously. It was situated near the “Big” road and about .75 yards from the defendant’s residence, but it does not appear whose land it was on. They also discovered a sack of soured chop in defendant’s crib. . He explained that he had moved to this place a short time before; that he knew nothing of the still, but had found the drop lying near another still located in a hollow some distance away and carried the officers to that location; there were scattered ■ slop and other things at this place, his further statement • being that he carried the chop home with him for chicken feed. The commonwealth’s evidence does not disclose * how long defendant had been in the vicinity, but it does .appear that he had not been at that place longer than a few days. It is further shown that his reputation for violation of the liquor laws is bad; ’ However, it is not *759 claimed that there was any path leading to the still, and, in view of the fact that it was not shown to have been on his premises or to have been operated while he was in the vicinity, we do not think this evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Reversing.

Alvin Newsome was convicted of the offense of manufacturing spirituous liquor. The officers acting under ■ a search warrant discovered a still which bore evidence ■ of having been used something like a week or more previously. It was situated near the “Big” road and about .75 yards from the defendant’s residence, but it does not appear whose land it was on. They also discovered a sack of soured chop in defendant’s crib. . He explained that he had moved to this place a short time before; that he knew nothing of the still, but had found the drop lying near another still located in a hollow some distance away and carried the officers to that location; there were scattered ■ slop and other things at this place, his further statement • being that he carried the chop home with him for chicken feed. The commonwealth’s evidence does not disclose * how long defendant had been in the vicinity, but it does .appear that he had not been at that place longer than a few days. It is further shown that his reputation for violation of the liquor laws is bad; ’ However, it is not *759 claimed that there was any path leading to the still, and, in view of the fact that it was not shown to have been on his premises or to have been operated while he was in the vicinity, we do not think this evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 S.W. 963, 221 Ky. 758, 1927 Ky. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newsome-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1927.