Newsome v. Bono
This text of 737 N.W.2d 727 (Newsome v. Bono) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond NEWSOME and Nancy Newsome, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
Peter BONO, D.O., Tri County Orthopedics, P.C., and Botsford General Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*728 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the portion of the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, because the dismissal should have been without prejudice. See Kirkaldy v. Rim, 478 Mich. 581, 734 N.W.2d 201. Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of an appropriate order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 N.W.2d 727, 480 Mich. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newsome-v-bono-mich-2007.