Newsom v. . Bufferlow

17 N.C. 67
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1831
StatusPublished

This text of 17 N.C. 67 (Newsom v. . Bufferlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newsom v. . Bufferlow, 17 N.C. 67 (N.C. 1831).

Opinion

The clerk, in his report, does not distinguish between the plaintiff's own costs, when defendant in ejectment, and those which they paid the plaintiff at law as his costs. The last only can be decreed to be repaid by the defendant to the plaintiffs. Their own costs the defendants at law threw away by defending in that court upon an equitable title, and cannot recover back. Keaton v. Cobb, 16 N.C. 439. The clerk must again inquire upon that point, and in his report distinguish the taxed costs at law of the plaintiffs, or either of them, from those of the present defendant.

PER CURIAM. Order renewed. *Page 63

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keaton v. . Cobb
16 N.C. 439 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1830)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.C. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newsom-v-bufferlow-nc-1831.