Newport v. Newport

131 Misc. 851, 228 N.Y.S. 313, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 805
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Frankenthaler, J.

Defendant cannot avail himself of the existence of the separation agreement which he has concededly failed to perform. Plaintiff’s institution of this action for a separation in which she asked for and obtained temporary alimony amounted to a repudiation of the agreement and an election to rescind the same. (See Landes v. Landes, 172 App. Div. 758; Randolph v. Field, 165 id. 279.)

Judgment will be for plaintiff, with twenty-five dollars per week alimony. Defendant’s motions to dismiss the complaint, upon which decision was reserved, are denied, with exceptions. Submit findings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newport v. Newport, 131 Misc. 851, 228 N.Y.S. 313, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 805 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1928).

131 Misc. 851 (Newport v. Newport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nilsson v. Nilsson
200 Misc. 841 (New York Family Court, 1951)
Jenkins v. Jenkins
179 Misc. 905 (New York Family Court, 1942)
Breiterman v. Breiterman
239 A.D. 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Hirschthal v. Hirschthal
134 Misc. 479 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1929)