Home/Superior Court of Rhode Island/Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.

Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.

7 R.I. Dec. 67
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedNovember 15, 1930
DocketEq. No. 2317
StatusPublished

This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 67 (Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc., 7 R.I. Dec. 67 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion to adjudge respondent in con[68]*68tempt for failure to comply with an order entered in said case by Mr. Justice Carpenter. The order was made in a temporary restraining order duly entered until a hearing upon the merits in said cause.

For complainants: Burdick, Corco-ran & Peekham. For respondents: Robert M. Daunin.

The evidence discloses that respondent has not complied with such restraining order but has ignored the same.

Respondent is adjudged in contempt of which it may purge itself by payment of a penalty of one hundred dollars on or before November 17, 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 R.I. Dec. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newport-providence-railway-v-paramount-coach-inc-risuperct-1930.