Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.

7 R.I. Dec. 67

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided November 15, 1930·No. Eq. No. 2317·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion to adjudge respondent in con[68]*68tempt for failure to comply with an order entered in said case by Mr. Justice Carpenter. The order was made in a temporary restraining order duly entered until a hearing upon the merits in said cause.

For complainants: Burdick, Corco-ran & Peekham. For respondents: Robert M. Daunin.

The evidence discloses that respondent has not complied with such restraining order but has ignored the same.

Respondent is adjudged in contempt of which it may purge itself by payment of a penalty of one hundred dollars on or before November 17, 1930.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion to adjudge respondent in con[68]*68tempt for failure to comply with an order entered in said case by Mr. Justice Carpenter. The order was made in a temporary restraining order duly entered until a hearing upon the merits in said cause.

For complainants: Burdick, Corco-ran & Peekham. For respondents: Robert M. Daunin.

The evidence discloses that respondent has not complied with such restraining order but has ignored the same.

Respondent is adjudged in contempt of which it may purge itself by payment of a penalty of one hundred dollars on or before November 17, 1930.

Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc., 7 R.I. Dec. 67 (R.I. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

7 R.I. Dec. 67 (Newport & Providence Railway v. Paramount Coach, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.