Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Hastings
This text of 11 F. App'x 296 (Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company petitions for review of the *297 decision and order of the Benefits Review Board affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and orders awarding benefits and attorney fees. We affirm.
We find that the ALJ’s finding that Joseph R. Hastings had asbestosis and that it hastened his death is supported by substantial evidence. See 33 U.S.C. § 921(b)(3) (1994); Gilchrist v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 135 F.3d 915, 918 (4th Cir.1998). We further find that the ALJ did not abuse its discretion by awarding attorney fees to the Claimant.
Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s decision and order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newport-news-shipbuilding-dry-dock-co-v-hastings-ca4-2001.