Newport National Bank v. Tweed

9 Del. 97
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1869·Published

Opinion

The cashier of the Bank testified to the making and indorsement of the note and the discounting of it by the Bank, also to the nonpayment of it by the maker at maturity, and that it was duly protested for non payment, and that he gave the Notary Public directions to issue the notices of the protest and to address one of them by mail that day to the defendant at his residence in Newark, and saw the notices duly prepared by him, but not that he saw them inclosed, addressed, or deposited, in the post office at Newport.

On motion of the counsel for the defendant the plaintiff was nonsuited.

Harrington, for the plaintiff.

Whitely, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newport National Bank v. Tweed, 9 Del. 97 (Del. Ct. App. 1869).

9 Del. 97 (Newport National Bank v. Tweed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.