Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Investors, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Investors, Inc.

580 So. 2d 894, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341, 1991 WL 104525

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1991·No. No. 90-1521·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So.2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat’l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So.2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So.2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law and summary final judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So.2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat’l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So.2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So.2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law and summary final judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.

Affirmed.

Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Investors, Inc., 580 So. 2d 894, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341, 1991 WL 104525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

580 So. 2d 894 (Newport Motel, Inc. v. Five Seas Investors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related