Newmyer Vs. Premier One Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
EDWARD A. NEWMYER, AN No. 79594 INDIVIDUAL,
Appellant,
vs.
PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS, INC., A FILED NEVADA CORPORATION; MRT ASSETS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED- SEP 2 1 2(119 LIABILITY COMPANY; RONE CHANG, BROWN CLERK REME COURT
AN INDIVIDUAL; MICHAEL H. RING, BY
AN INDIVIDUAL; AND CALVIN FUNG, DEPUTY CLERK
AN INDIVIDUAL,
Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a findings of fact, conclusions of law, and dismissal with prejudice. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, Judge.
Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NR.AP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be prematurely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion under NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion has been formally resolved. Appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration and the court has set the motion for hearing. A timely tolling motion terminates the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the
SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA
0) 1447A .4W
F
district court enters a written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). This court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
J.
Parraguirre
J.
Cadish
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Edward A. Newmyer Morris Law Center Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF W.VA0A
(0) 1547A .4110.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
448 P.3d 1124 (Newmyer Vs. Premier One Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.