Newmark v. Horowitz Bros.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Newmark v. Horowitz Bros.

116 N.Y.S. 564

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.Y.S. 564 (Newmark v. Horowitz Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newmark v. Horowitz Bros., 116 N.Y.S. 564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears t'o be established by the affidavits, without specific contradiction, that the person served with the summons was neither a director nor an officer of defendant corporation, nor in any way authorized to accept service for the corporation, nor has the corporation appeared'in the action, except specially to have the judgment set aside.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears t'o be established by the affidavits, without specific contradiction, that the person served with the summons was neither a director nor an officer of defendant corporation, nor in any way authorized to accept service for the corporation, nor has the corporation appeared'in the action, except specially to have the judgment set aside.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 N.Y.S. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newmark-v-horowitz-bros-nyappterm-1909.