Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a Newmark v. KS 50 Sussex Avenue LP

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 10, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-03888·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEWMARK & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, INC., Plaintiff, 23-cv-3888 (AS) -against- ORDER KS 50 SUSSEX AVENUE LP et al., Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: As the parties agree and have shown, Plaintiff and Defendants were New York citizens at the start of this action, depriving the Court of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Dkt. 55. The case is thus DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

The Court will retain jurisdiction, however, over Plaintiff's sanctions motion. See Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 U.S. 131 (1992); Castillo Grand, LLC v. Sheraton Operating Corp., 719 F.3d 120, 124 (2d Cir. 2013). Plaintiff may file such a motion by April 26, 2024. Defendants’ response will be due by May 10, 2024, and Plaintiff’s reply will be due by May 17, 2024. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2024 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a Newmark v. KS 50 Sussex Avenue LP, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a Newmark v. KS 50 Sussex Avenue LP (Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a Newmark v. KS 50 Sussex Avenue LP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willy v. Coastal Corp.
503 U.S. 131 (Supreme Court, 1992)